-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just before launching into this particularly exciting retrospective on one of Disney's biggest Visual Effects projects let me take a moment to mention a terrific new feature length special effects documentary that has just been launched and is excellent and will prove of interest to many of the regular (and some irregular) readers of this blog. A SENSE OF SCALE is a mammoth 140 minute collection of face to face interviews with dozens of leading miniature specialists such as Greg Jein, Robert Skotak, Martin Bower, Mark Stetson, Gene Warren jr and many others. Film maker Berton Pierce has gone to extraordinary lengths in traversing the Atlantic to record interviews with these skilled technicians with exclusive peeks into their workshops and behind the scenes material from many, mostly post eighties films. The DVD is a 2 disc set loaded with great info,insight and good humour from it's numerous participants. I'd liked to have seen a quick montage of vintage miniature work and those practitioners such as John Fulton, Arnold Gillespie, Donald Jahraus and Ivyl Burks, just to balance it out, but sadly that wasn't a consideration by the producers who want to concentrate on more recent events.
Among the many aspects of miniature effects work delved into was the particularly interesting 'big budget versus small budget' section where to my surprise, most of the participants revealed a far greater love for the modest and low budget jobs over the mega million contracts. Really fascinating. Sadly, several of those interviewed are counting down the days when miniaturists such as themselves will no longer be required and it'll all go the way of traditional matte painting...down the gurgler and into a godammed computer program! Can it possibly get any worse than that???
I really can't fault Berton's film at all. A polished, thoroughly professional labour of love for sure with the only missing potential interviewee being Richard Taylor from New Zealand's own WETA Workshop. Richard is incredibly passionate (to say the least) about traditional miniature craftsmanship and I'd love to have seen him in the documentary showing us through WETA.... but I suppose we can't have it all!
For more information on this extraordinary DVD, click here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Matte painter P.S (Harrison) Ellenshaw |
Welcome to the second part of my Disney
Epics blog, with a close look at the many special matte and miniature trick
shots in the 1974 show ISLAND AT THE TOP OF THE WORLD. Once again I’m very much indebted to former Disney matte
painter and later head of the matte department Harrison Ellenshaw - a gentleman and a good sport - for his
considerable and generous input as well
as numerous fascinating recollections of his own experiences while assisting
Alan Maley with the many, many matte painted shots which would form the
backbone of the film.
The immortal line "France will rule the air" (!) provided nice subtext to this multi part matte shot (to be explained later...) |
Our scenario, set in 1907 – a good period
for high adventure - revolves around a somewhat mismatched group (aren’t they
always?) of intrepid explorers – the requisite dashing American archaeologist
(the hopelessly wooden and monotone David Hartman who in every scene suggests
he’s narrating a Disney trailer), a wealthy Englishman (a very irritating
Donald Sinden), an eccentric French inventor (quintessential French character
actor Jacques Marin) and an Eskimo (Mako, taking a break from Korean POW’s on
MASH) on a trek to the North Pole, or thereabouts, in a frantic search for
Sinden’s long lost son. Their quest
brings them to a lost Shangri-La world of Vikings, volcanoes and the storied
Whales’ Graveyard. All good stuff in a
very Jules Verne-esque tailored adventure. The basic plot here has plenty of
potential, and I can’t help but feel much more could have come of it in better
directorial hands. My conversations with
Harrison Ellenshaw have been entertaining to say the least. Seems Harrison isn’t anywhere near as
forgiving as I am and found a re-screening of the DVD to be a tedious and
pedestrian affair with about a hundred too many reaction shots, endless
exposition and Donald Sinden, who chews the scenery like a Harryhausen
Rhedosaurus, though without the Beastly charm.
The film, while by no means one of Disney’s
most memorable efforts, is an entertaining and action packed yarn very much of
a style no longer seen nowadays. If
there were one major failing it would have to be the dull in house ‘direction
by the numbers’ so often employed from within the inner workings of The Mouse
Factory, with the bar rarely being set above TV Movie of the Week in terms of
character development, dialogue, lighting, pacing and overall creative film
making. Let’s face it, Disney heads were
adamant that all of their cinematic product looked, sounded and tasted exactly
the same – no seasoning please - though I’m the first to admit I still enjoy
many of their shows as much now as I did when seeing them on first release. More often than not the impression a film
left upon me in my younger days at the Saturday Matinee double feature still
retains that much loved flavour 40 to 50
years later, more so in fact than the average dross that passes as ‘cinema’
these days.
More magnificent pre-production art by Peter Ellenshaw. |
The vast scale of the production was a
mammoth production design project, with Disney Studios’ pre-eminent
collaborator and visual stylist Peter Ellenshaw engaged to oversee not only the
entire special effects shoot but the overall production design as well. I’m convinced that all that is great about
this film is a direct result of Peter’s hands on involvement and creative
foresight in the film’s look. An
astounding number of beautiful and evocative acrylic conceptual paintings were
prepared by Ellenshaw, and thanks to Peter’s son Harrison, I’m delighted to
include many of those here in this article.
Despite the aforementioned quibbles, ISLAND
remains a treat for traditional era matte art enthusiasts with an astonish
quota of matte shots filling out the narrative, with many set pieces consisting
of wall to wall painted mattes, some of which are extremely successful – and
I’m thinking of the wonderful glacier and crater painted shots in addition to
the Shangri-La Viking city shots being quite glorious renderings in their own right.
An utterly glorious Ellenshaw concept painting for a view not used in the final film. |
Supervising matte artist Alan Maley. |
The majority of the mattes were painted by
then head of department Alan Maley with long time assistant painter Constantine
‘Deno’ Ganakes and apprentice matte artist P.S (Harrison) Ellenshaw providing
sturdy support with the substantial ‘block in’ preparatory work of the several
dozen paintings which would form the basis of close to 93 finished ‘cuts’ with
matte art. One or two mattes for the
climactic Whales Graveyard sequence were painted by veteran MGM artist Matthew
Yuricich on a brief stopover at Disney.
Photographic Effects supervisor and the film’s Production Designer Peter
Ellenshaw would himself provide more than a dozen painted mattes for the
volcanic sulphur field trek in the final weeks of post-production to help meet
deadlines. It was by all accounts a very
busy matte department.
A quick Ellenshaw sketch rescued later from a garage sale! |
As a comparison I feel that the earlier IN
SEARCH OF THE CASTAWAYS to be a considerably better film, with smoother,
frequently arresting photographic
effects shots – a great many which still look like a million dollars over fifty
years down the track. ISLAND probably
has a greater number of trick shots and would be the all time record setter for
the studio though some of the painted mattes look extremely rushed and several
painting composites tend to be like a poke in the eye with a sharp stick with
very poor washed out RP plates ill matched against the painted element. Of course, not all is lost with alot of great mattes and even several
surprisingly invisible matte combinations that slip by all but unnoticed, as we
shall see in the large photo spread later in this article.
Miniatures Supervisor Terry Saunders and Hyperion model. |
While matte art was of major urgency the
Mechanical Effects Department at Disney, under long time head Danny Lee, was
engaged in building and controlling a large miniature of the main ‘star’ of the
picture, The Hyperion airship. The design
is somewhat wacky and unappealing and I find that the earlier, rejected
concepts of the airship to be more of my liking and quite elegant. Miniaturist Terry Saunders and his team built
the airship with veteran Effects Cinematographer Art Cruickshank as D.P on all
of the quite variable miniature shots.
Cruickshank had been with the Disney Studio since the 1940’s and had
been buried away in the Process Department under Ub Iwerks, working on opticals
for films such as FANTASIA. A brief
departure in the mid 1960’s saw Art move over to 20th Century Fox to
work as Bill Abbott’s right hand man on many films and television shows, with
Art collecting an Oscar for his extensive optical work on FANTASTIC VOYAGE before
being coaxed back to Disney in the early 1970’s where he remained until his
sudden death in 1983.
Peter and his wife Bobbie on 2nd Unit in Norway. |
Still photography came into play in several
areas of the matte effects. To prepare
for a number of proposed matte shots, Peter Ellenshaw was sent to the Norway
location to shoot 2nd Unit sequences. While there Peter took numerous stills with a
35mm Leica SLR using motion picture film.
The ‘Leica’ roll’s were then developed at Technicolor normally and then
the optical department at Disney made separation (YCM masters) from the
developed negative. Chosen frames were
then used as rear projection elements in the matte department. However, prior to the matte paintings being
started, the chosen frames were enlarged as 8x10” photo prints, from which
Peter would make very rough sketches of scenic alterations and additions, in
acrylic, on top of the b&w prints as a general guide for the matte painters
(see below).
Hyperion miniature temporarily in the matte painting dept. for final touch ups. |
In addition to the above, high quality
colour stills were taken of the model Hyperion airship from a variety of
different angles. These were blown up to
12x16” on photo print paper and then cut out and glued onto clear glass. The photo glass could then be integrated with
various fully painted glasses depicting any number of scenic requirements from
England’s White Cliffs of Dover to the ice flows of the Northern Arctic.
This same process would prove an enormous time saver and would be used again the following year by Peter Ellenshaw’s former assistant, Albert Whitlock, over at Universal Studios for the Oscar winning visual effects on THE HINDENBURG with stunning and seemless results.
This same process would prove an enormous time saver and would be used again the following year by Peter Ellenshaw’s former assistant, Albert Whitlock, over at Universal Studios for the Oscar winning visual effects on THE HINDENBURG with stunning and seemless results.
A spectacular conceptual painting by Peter Ellenshaw which is far grander than that delivered on the big screen. |
ISLAND was a prolonged and drawn out
affair, production wise. As early as
1968 a pre-production trailer emerged and this included quite different
concepts such as a very interesting ‘dual-airship’ notion which I rather
liked. These early concepts were the
work of an unknown Disney art director.
The official pre-production for the film commenced at Disney late 1971
or early 1972. The Norway 2nd
Unit photography took place in July 1972.
Main production shooting started at the Disney Studios in Burbank in
April 1973. The picture was released in
November 1974 with it’s UK premiere, though not a Royal Command Performance as some are, attended by Queen Elizabeth and two of her
sons in December 1974. When asked,
Harrison told me; “It’s a long timeline,
but that was typical in those days”.
So, with that, let us take a look back at
the multitude of mattes, miniatures and special processes in Disney’s ISLAND AT
THE TOP OF THE WORLD…………………………………………………
Special Photographic Effects: Peter Ellenshaw
Optical Process Supervisor: Eustace Lycette
Special Mechanical Effects: Danny Lee
Miniatures Photography: Art Cruickshank
Effects Camera Operators: Dick Kendall & Phil
Meador
Supervising Matte Artist: Alan Maley
Matte Artists: P.S (Harrison) Ellenshaw,
Matthew Yuricich & Deno Ganakes
Matte Photography: Bob Wilson, Bill Kilduff and Ed Sekac
VistaVision Projectionist: Don Henry
Special Effects Technicians: David Lee, Chuck Gaspar, Mike
Reedy & Hans Mietz
Optical Cinematography: Bob Broughton
Miniatures: Terry
Saunders
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow... what a sensational composition. |
The Hyperion and out takes from Art Cruickshank's unit. |
Very reminiscent of both JOURNEY TO THE CENTRE OF THE EARTH and IN SEARCH OF THE CASTAWAYS. |
More of Peter's concept art. |
Another of Peter's quick 'photo paint overs' to establish the desired look for a proposed matte shot. |
In addition to designing the film and painting a dozen glass shots, Peter Ellenshaw also painted the beautiful views of this mythical land to be seen under the main titles. |
Camera slate from the first matte to be photographed. |
Harrison Ellenshaw remembers his 'baptism by fire' on
THE ISLAND AT THE TOP OF THE WORLD (1974)
FX call sheet |
I’d like to welcome former Disney
matte artist Harrison Ellenshaw for a
candid look back in time of his experience working as assistant matte painter
on The Island at the Top of the World.
Q: Let
me say Harrison that I like this movie.
It thrilled me back in the day and I still find it an entertaining
(though admittedly childish) bit of Disney escapism. For my money it’s one hell of a visual
effects achievement for its time and a great many of the mattes still thrill me
to this day. Not everything works as far
as the visual effects go, but given the volume of trick shots I still regard it
as a pretty fair success rate.
A: For
me, it was “baptism under fire.” I had
been in the Disney matte department as a lowly apprentice for only about a year
when pre-production began on ISLAND. I
felt that I would barely be able to contribute in any meaningful way. But the department head, Alan Maley (shown at left) gave me
plenty to do besides wash brushes.
Q: Now
this show I know you have a lot of memories of – some quite mixed I believe?
A:
Actually, except for the fact that I thought
the final film was not very good, it was a wonderful experience. I was so
fortunate to be working for Alan who taught me so much about filmmaking and
painting. My father was also the
production designer and visual effects supervisor, so although I was at the
bottom of the ladder, I would see him often. I learned a tremendous amount on
that show.
Q: Tell
us, how did this picture come about?
A:
I believe the movie was in development at
Disney for some time; at least 5 or 6 years. Winston Hibler who had been at
Disney for many years was the producer from the beginning.
Q: What
was the budget, can you recall, and did it make a buck?
A: I had no idea what the budget was then. It wasn’t the kind of information that would
be shared with a lowly assistant. I
would hazard a guess of about $3-4 million.
I have no idea if it made money, in the early 70s box office totals did
not have the kind of attention they do today.
Eustace Lycette at optical printer. |
Q: As
someone who has seen pretty much every Disney film over the years, this one
must rank as the biggest effects showcase of them all – possibly barring The
Black Hole. I’ve always been staggered
at the sheer number of matte painted shots, not to mention the wall to wall
sodium vapour composites by Eustace Lycette.
Would Island be the record setter as far as Disney matte paintings go in
a single film?
Optical cameraman Bob Broughton. |
A:
There were almost 100 painted
matte shots in the film. Probably a
record for a Disney film or perhaps even any major studio film at the
time. In addition there were 262
traveling mattes, including both sodium vapour and blue screen composites.
Q: So,
does that mean one hundred actual paintings or that number in ‘cuts’
where we might see the same matte more than once, editorially?
A: Probably
number of cuts, but I would guess there were at least 85 or 90 actual
paintings.
Q: It
surely out numbers Mary Poppins by a fairly significant chunk?
A: Though
I bet there are at least 80 matte paintings in Mary Poppins. I should count
them one day.
Q: At
that time in ’74 I assume Alan Maley was in charge of running the matte
department. Who else was there then?
Harrison with Don Henry, Deno Ganakes & Ed Sekacs. |
A: There
was Deno Ganakes and myself. There was
also another apprentice there whose name I don’t recall. He didn’t last long. I think he didn’t really want to learn matte
painting. We had a projectionist for the
rear projection, Don Henry. The matte
cameramen were Bob Wilson, Bill Kilduff and Ed Sekac. They would split their
time between the matte department and the optical department in another
building. This was before Star Wars (1977) and visual effects was not as sexy
as it is now. In fact being able to do
matte painting was NOT considered an art or creative in any way. The criticism
being that it was only “just painting like a photograph.” Some people still feel that way. But I can assure you it wasn’t easy at all.
Q: For
me Harrison, there ain’t nothing sexier than a traditionally painted matte…
well, almost nothing! (I seriously need to get out of the house more!)
Peter Ellenshaw: 'What, me worry?' |
A: Thank you for the compliment. Though I have to say there are very few
people who know what a matte shot is.
Much less the difference between traditional and digital. As to how sexy traditional painted mattes
really are, I am not so sure about that.
I still don’t know of any beautiful woman who dated me because I was
matte artist. Maybe they did, I just
figured it was my incredible charm. (Laughs.)
Q: I
wasn’t terribly keen on the miniatures though, nor the cinematography of
them. Was that Art Cruickshank’s area?
A:
Art was the cinematographer for
the miniature unit. But my father was
the director and he would certainly take full responsibility for the miniatures. I agree that they didn’t always work
well. I know my father felt the same
way.
Pre-production art suitable for framing. |
Q: Until
I interviewed Matthew Yuricich recently, I had no idea that he was also
involved with mattes at Disney. He
specifically recalled Island but couldn’t remember if he’d worked on a second
film there as well?
A:
I am pretty sure that Matt only worked on Island for a very short period of
time.
Q: Matt’s
painting of the Whale Graveyard was a tilt/pan shot up and across, so I assume
that was a pretty large painting? What
was the typical sized painting on Island?
A:
Most paintings were done on
(regular window) glass in wooden frames measuring 30 x 40”. But some paintings were done on Masonite
(hardboard) 4 x 8’.
Title sequence painting. |
Q: Now,
I was speaking with Michelle Moen recently and she told me she was surprised at
how small the Disney glass mattes were compared to what she was used to, when
she painted on Dick Tracy – excluding of course those two gigantic Tracy Town
panoramas.
A: Michelle is so talented that she easily adapted to the 30 x 40” glass. Painting bigger doesn’t necessarily help and usually takes longer. If you can’t make it work at 30 x 40” you aren’t going to make it work at a larger size either. Putting too much detail into large paintings is usually a detriment. It might impress the producers, but it won’t impress the audience. Size is everything, you know.
Q: Now
I’m sure this was confusion on Matthew’s part, but he did say that Albert was
there, though I can’t think for the life of me what he was doing there. Are you able to clarify whether the ‘Albert’
Matt spoke of was Peter’s former assistant Albert Whitlock, or another ‘Albert’
altogether? It would seem so strange if
Whitlock were at Disney then??
A: You are correct, Albert Whitlock had left Disney a number of years before. By the 70s he was at Universal studios heading up the matte department there. There was no other ‘Albert’ in the matte department.
Q: Speaking
of Albert, he had his own big airship effects showcase to contend with the following
year with The Hindenburg – itself a pretty staggering achievement, and even
more so for a tiny matte department. As
you did on your show, Albert used a lot of photographs of their miniature
zeppelin pasted on glass as well and combined these very successfully with
paintings and other atmospheric effects.
He said once that to paint the damned zeppelin from scratch for so many
shots would have been so tedious and the use of hand coloured photographic
stills were a godsend if they ever hoped to complete the film in the required
timeframe. Sound familiar?
A:
Yes, it does sound familiar; you use whatever means you can. In visual
effects you don’t get points for degree of difficulty.
Q: Of
course, all of your own hard work went by un-credited, which I guess was
nothing unusual at the time?
Another 'photo paint over' by Peter. |
A: I guess I should have received credit as: Brush-washer and Record-keeper-person...... P.S. Ellenshaw.
Q: Why
“P.S. Ellenshaw?” I understand it used
to be ‘Peter Samuel’, is that right?
A: Yes. Until 1978, I took credit on a number of films as
"P.S. Ellenshaw" including Star Wars.
A few months after the release of Star Wars I was having lunch with my
father at the Disney commissary and someone came up to our table and gushed to
my father about what a wonderful job he had done on Star Wars. I waited, hoping that quickly my father would
point out at that it was me not him that had done the matte
paintings. But the clarification never
came, my father thanked the person and he walked off. My father laughed knowing
how pissed off I was not to getting the credit. “That’s it!” I said, “I’m changing my
name.” So I changed my first name to
Harrison.
Q: Yes, I
have heard that story. Apparently your
father was totally poker faced while accepting the compliment – much to your
gob smacked bemusement!! Why change
to‘Harrison’ in particular?
A: Because “Harrison Ellenshaw” just sounded
good.
Q: Well,
‘Archibald Leach’ made the big time when he became ‘Cary Grant’ you know, and
snogging Grace Kelly certainly isn’t to be sneezed at!
A: I
would have changed my name to Cary Grant too if I could have snogged with Grace
Kelly. But then it probably wasn’t about the name, was it?
Q: So,
with such a vast schedule and quota of mattes and other trick shots, how did
this news go down amid the boys in the matte department?
A: It was exciting to work on a big epic with so
many shots. When you love what you do,
then more work is always welcomed.
Certainly it was a very challenging show, but that’s what can make it so
satisfying.
Q: How
many mattes did you complete yourself Harrison?
A: Only one or two. I was pretty raw and even though I worked on
a number of shots, it would take Alan’s artistic hand to finish the shot and
“make it right”.
Q: The
matte department must have been one busy beehive that year! Were there any other Disney matte shows under
way concurrently?
A: It
seems to me that Island was the only one.
Q: What
sort of release ‘deadline’ did you all face?
I recall it being a big summer time release here in New Zealand back in
Xmas ‘74 (December is our summer peak).
A:
We had over a year for post
production. In those days you finished
all the work with plenty of time left before the release date. Part of the reason was that back then the
studios had show all films as completed movies to theater owners well before
the release date. The theater owners
would then competitively bid against each other for the right to exhibit the
film.
Q: So
Harrison, run us through the time frame if you would? Final script, Conceptual art, Matte tests,
Final comps, Re-shoots – the whole nine
yards?
Wooden actors comped into wonderful matte art. |
A: I think the final script was already
complete when I first arrived at the matte department in November of 1970. At that time concept drawings and
illustrations were already underway, but the film did not yet have a “green
light”. I don’t think the term “green
light” was even used way back then. Second unit photography took place in
Norway in July and August of 1972. First
unit started shooting on the sound stages in Burbank in April 1973. The miniature unit, also shot in Burbank in
the fall of the same year. My guess is
that matte shots and opticals were worked on from late 1973 until summer 1974. The film had a release date in November of
1974.
A rare alternate Hyperion design without crazy 'nose'. |
Q: Although
not your domain, my sympathies always lie with the optical effects department
on these shows as Disney seemed near pathological when it came to shooting everything
against a yellow and sometimes blue screen and comping in the backgrounds later
– often just to add in a simple blue sky no less. I pity those poor guys like Eustace Lycette
and Bob Broughton who really had their work cut out for them!
A: The
Disney optical department was called The Process Lab then. They had the responsibility to do all
optical/effects work for the studio which not only included sodium shots and
blue screen shots, but main and end titles, trailers, simple cross dissolves
and fades, all foreign release main/end titles, television opticals, etc. The
amount of work was huge.
Sketch for proposed, unfilmed modern day prologue. |
Q: I
take it that all matte painting comps were the tried and true Disney
VistaVision rear projection process?
Were they RGB separations?
A:
Yes, rear projection was a
very flexible system, you could use as many live action plates as you needed on
one shot. As opposed to original
negative or bi-pack, which could yield very high resolution results but it was
extremely limited. However if you were
clever enough, RP could be high resolution as well. That’s why we shot the plates in VistaVision,
to hold the quality through the duping process.
'Photo paint over' for the spectacular Hyperion lift off FX sequence. |
Q: I’d
think this would be an enormous time saver in matching painted elements to
plates. I know that Jim Danforth was a
strong advocate in RP composites, and with terrific results.
A:
Jim is a very talented
guy. He mastered a lot of different
techniques.
Q: The
long shot of the monastery up on the hill above the market place had a tilt
camera move added. The painting is
loose, impressionistic yet sensational, and even with the quite evident brush
strokes visible it still manages to sell the Lost Horizon flavour really
well. A lot of people have told me how
much they loved that shot.
One of the 59 blue screen travelling mattes. |
A:
Classic stuff, I agree. And let’s remember there was no motion
control for the tilt. The move had to be
made by hand and repeated four times perfectly matched. Very tedious stuff.
Q: Many
of the comps with paint and live action work pretty well I thought, though
there were some gaping ‘poke in the eye’ composites which missed the mark by a
mile, such as the entrance to the temple with badly matched hues and glaring
matte lines - seen as well with the interiors with the huge statues and some
shots with the lava flowing by. The
colours are all washed out in the plates and don’t really fit well. What happened there? Was it a case of being rushed or what?
'Photo paint over' concept for the mountain trek matte shots. |
A: Not
rushed. No excuse they just didn’t work
well, that’s all. We thought they looked good at the time. But they don’t hold up. I would love to see
the film get a digital upgrade by a good colorist.
Q: Were
there any original negative shots on this project?
A:
No, all were either rear
projection or opticals or all miniature.
Q: Having
just reviewed and written extensively about the much earlier Disney epic In
Search of the Castaways I can’t help but compare the mattes with this show and
as much as I like Island, the paintings and especially the composites
for the most part don’t come close to those amazingly clean blends seen in
Castaways some 14 years earlier, most of which were exquisite.
Mako goes ape-shit with a butter knife! Disney ultra-violence. |
A: You
are absolutely right - the matte composites on Castaways are so much better than
Island. I really don’t know why. But perhaps they were bi-packed or optically
composited, I know, almost for certain, that they were not rear projected. Credit for Castaways need to go to the
English crew who created such high quality effects. It’s a bit odd that over time, the quality of
English effects began to tail off and by the time we got to the early 80s, it
was virtually impossible to get even a simple cross dissolve out of the UK.
Bit
sad considering the amazing achievement of 2001 A Space Odyssey (1968), which
was all done in England.
Q: Nothing has ever looked as good as all of that o/neg work in 2001. It's sublime. So,
who photographed the plates on Island?
Who else was involved with the composites?
Peter with 2nd Unit cameraman Andrew Jackson in Norway. |
A:
My father shot all the plates
in Norway. Alan Maley supervised plate photography in California.
Q: I
recall seeing a Disney TV special years ago which visited various departments
on the lot, including the matte department. They demonstrated several before and afters
from Island and a few other films such as Something Wicked This Way Comes. I wish I could track this doco down somehow!
A: I don’t remember that documentary. It may be
in the Disney vaults but it is probably mislabeled.
Q: It’s
surprising you know Harrison, no matter how well I know an effects show, or at
least think I do, I often stumble across trick shots years later that I missed
previously, with Island being one such film.
There’s this great shot of the group marching along a wooded area and
only the other day did I spot a significant amount of painted foreground trees
and rocks etc added to the shot, which I’d not noticed before. Go on Harrison…. tell NZPete that was YOUR
invisible shot?
A:
Oh, I think this was a trick
question. I did do this shot and it may
be the only one that Alan did NOT finish.
Q: Al
Whitlock once said that “the true special effect is the one that nobody ever
notices”. Would you concur?
A: Yes, I would definitely agree, but I would
also add that some shots can’t ever not be noticed. Think if you’re
doing paintings that take place in a galaxy far far away.
Q: With
so much on his plate, both as production designer and photographic
effects chief, how much painting did Peter manage to do on this show?
A:
Peter came in at the final
weeks to help out in the matte department by doing about a dozen shots of the
volcano sequence.
Q: I just can't get a handle on what secret fuel drove your father. The man was an unstoppable genius! Some
of my own personal favourite mattes happen to be up in the glacier with that
huge crater looking down – I love the brushwork here and sense of light
glinting off of the ice. Those really
look like your father’s shots….would I be right?
Curiously colour timed sodium composite shot. |
A:
Those were Alan Maley’s
shots. But they definitely show the
influence of Peter. Remember that before
he took over the matte department Alan worked under Peter’s supervision for
about six years at Disney in Burbank.
Alan was hugely talented. He has
been very much underrated in my opinion.
Q: Some
of the mattes look amazingly ‘loose’ – though still work – and I’m thinking of
the early shots of the airship outside the hangar and the initial flight. This work looks to me as though a single
artist was responsible for that whole block of shots and look quite different
in style from the middle portion of the show which appears to have a distinct
style of it’s own with the Viking village and again different again from the
multitude of glacier and ice matte shots
that look like Peter’s brushwork to me?
Terry Saunders' miniature of The Hyperion in action. |
A:
All of those shots were done
by Alan Maley, though he would use Peter’s production illustrations as a style
guide for the final matte shots.
Teamwork by two great artists that, regrettably, is not as much in
evidence in today’s films. Now there are
dozens of effects facilities working on the many shots in a movie
Style has taken a back seat to design by
committees and an assembly line mentality where 15 or more people will work on
one shot. Ridiculous, in my opinion.
Extra, Extra: Viking cheesecake in sodium shot! Film at 11. |
Q: You
are so right Harrison. Interestingly,
several top shelf former matte artists today are actively engaged as art
directors – and I’m thinking Michael Pangrazio who did The Lovely Bones and
King Kong, Robert Stromberg on Avatar and of course the amazing Paul Lasaine
who designed much of the first Lord of the Rings picture. Do you think their unique training and
experience as traditional glass shot artists has played a significant part in
designing effects shots in this sophisticated era much as it did for your
father in the photo chemical era?
A:
Often outstanding artists are ambitious, they
look to have more influence in the visual storytelling process. The three that you mention are definitely the
cream of the crop. I admire what each
has achieved. Doing mattes will teach
you all manner of things having to do with filmmaking.
Q: One
thing I’ve always loved with Disney mattes of the past is the ‘ballsy’ approach
initiated by your father where so often rather than try to top up a shot with a
painting he’d just start from scratch and paint pretty much the whole damned
thing, with just a tiny slot of live action somewhere in the middle. I love those shots, and Island is no
exception, where the paint stretches right the way around into the immediate
foreground as well as the key point of the matte. Old shows like Davy Crockett, Darby
O’Gill and Blackbeard’s Ghost are filled
with bold shots like that, and I really admire guys like Peter for having the
guts to risk so much paint up there on a 50 foot movie screen.
'Photo paint over' for approach to lost valley matte. |
A:
The Disney studio approach was
to do things efficiently, but with quality.
Walt would say: “Why go to location when Peter Ellenshaw can create
something and perhaps even make it better than reality?” Many Disney films were fantasies anyway and
stark realism with high detail was not necessarily desired.
Q: Any
shots not make the final cut which you’d love to have seen included?
A: No,
can’t think of any. Back in those days,
indecision and last minute changes were considered the mark of amateurs.
Q: Did
many of the paintings survive? Did you
manage to grab any yourself?
"What the ****?" |
A:
A number of production illustrations by Peter
survive. Many are at Disney archives I believe. Hopefully the wonderful main title
backgrounds by Peter might still be at Disney, but I don’t know.
Q: I
saw that majestic approach to the city glass painting that you and Alan worked
on propped up against a wall in some promo footage taken at Buena Vista Visual
Effects. What happened to that?
A: When I left the studio in 1996 it was still
there.
Q: I
heard a rumour that Island was submitted to the Academy as a potential visual
effects nominee that year but failed to pass the selection process – is that
true?
A:
Yes, it was submitted.
Q: Do
you feel it was unjustly overlooked by the Demi-Gods of the Academy?
A: I think it hurt that it just wasn’t a very
good picture. For 1974 the visual effects Oscar went to Earthquake, not a bad
choice I guess. Island did get nominated
for Art Direction though. When you do
invisible work it can easily get overlooked. A good example is Dick Tracy
(1990), it won an Oscar for Art Direction and did not even get nominated for
visual effects!
Q: Don’t
get me started on bloody Oscar injustices Harrison! Dick Tracy absolutely should have been at the
very least a VFX nominee, if not a winner, though I can’t help but feel old
school glass paintings were just no longer considered ‘special’ by the
committee by that time, especially with everything going keyboard and
workstation(!) Grrrrrr!
A: Perhaps
in your next blog we can do a whole complaint section about Oscar injustices
(laughs).
Q: Oh…I
have some questions for you my friend!
Thanks once again for sharing these memories of a great Disney effects
show. It’s always a treat to chat with
you.
Below I am pleased to include the detailed visual effects notes as supplied to the Academy for proposed consideration in the Best Special Visual Effects category. The film was not successful.
_________________________________________________________________________________
The Matte & Miniature shots from THE ISLAND AT THE TOP OF THE WORLD
Now, I thought the Maurice Jarre score to be pretty good, though Harrison Ellenshaw said he found the music "annoying". |
The 'Horse's Ass Shot' - The Hyperion sails away in a none too flattering POV. Miniature and painted matte combination. |
Photograph of the miniature on on moving glass over separate Alan Maley full frame aerial matte painting. |
Some quite successful miniature shots directed by Peter Ellenshaw and shot by Art Cruickshank although Peter's son Harrison regarded it as a lot of shoddy work. |
The clouds part to reveal all. Full frame painting with foreground clouds on moving glass. |
Peter's concept painting for the Viking long house. I wished they'd have adhered more to this wonderful design than the one they eventually did utilise, as shown below. |
One of several conceptual suggestions for the approach to the city sequence. I rather like this one, especially the peaks. |
A rare glimpse of the same painting while propped up against a wall in the Buena Vista Visual Effects matte room circa 1996 |
I really like this matte by Alan Maley as it doesn't draw attention to itself and is very well executed. The Viking ship, lake and mountains are all 2nd Unit plate shot in Norway. |
Medium and close shots from the same sequence. I like the architecture here. |
The quintessential 'castle on a hilltop' matte shot painted by Alan Maley, and a beauty it is at that. Wonderful design and composition here. |
Before and after blue screen travelling matte process with painted matte of town below. |
Another stunning shot from the Disney matte department. |
The temple interior looked sensational in conceptual form as seen here, but I feel failed seriously in final execution. |
Improved view of the same matte composite as seen in the film's trailer where hues are more balanced and the painted people blend in somewhat better. |
More from the mountain trek with a surprisingly mismatched comp at upper right. Still at lower right shows a typical travelling matte set up being photographed. |
Several frames from the sulfur field trek- all painted by Peter Ellenshaw during the final few weeks of post production. |
More from the lava flow. Great lava effects and, at bottom right, a first rate comp of miniature and live action that kind of makes up for the dodgy comp mentioned earlier. Excellent work! |
Another ripper painted by the talented Alan Maley - an illusionist taken far too early from this world. Here's a straightforward matte painting which for me just works so elegantly. |
Miniature ice cavern measuring 6x4 feet and made from clear resin with actors skillfully matted in. Good lighting match and blend. |
And we're back to the very poor washed out matte comps which seem mostly evident in darker shots. There's alot to be said for original negative matte photography. |
Collapsing miniature ice cavern. |
Looking for the exit. Almost all paint except for narrow strip of live action. |
I asked Harrison about this shot: "This bay of whales may have been done by Matt Yuricich but I tend to think it's Alan's work as it looks more like his style. Nice mist overlay." |
Stuck on an iceflow. Shame about the none too subtle RP element where seemingly little attempt has been made to soften or 'feather out' the blend between process and paint. |
Great shot - all paint with lovely slot of sunlight peaking through the clouds across the ice. |
Matthew Yuricich painted this substantial full matte which was then photographed 'as is' with a realistic pan and tilt move. |
Peter Ellenshaw's concept painting for the bay of whales. |
'Da Dum.........Da Dum Da Dum........Da Dum Da Dum Da Dum Dum Dum............' |
Great volcano element and another one of those odd colour mismatch screw ups in the stage photography(???) |
Miniature of The Hyperion with a matte painting of the Captain and the poodle - both standing very still!! Moving mist was painted on a foreground glass for an altogether good trick shot. |
Excellent miniatures and camerawork here. Ex-Pat Englishman Terry Saunders built the miniatures and according to Harrison was an amazing model maker and mechanical effects person. |
High speed miniature photography by Art Cruickshank. |
The flying rig attached to The Hyperion on the Disney lot. |
Assorted ISLAND imagery, from large scale mechanical whale heads to very early advertising concept art. Yep, we've got it all at NZ Pete's Matte Shot blogspot! |
"It's them!" Godi and all his men on the cliff top is entirely painted, complete with moving mist on a foreground glass. |
Nice FX shot! |
A page from the impressive souvenir booklet which accompanied the film on first release. |
Yesss!
ReplyDeleteNow I know what I will do after work. Enjoying your new article, while sipping on a glass of good old Whisky. Thank you, Pete.
Funny thing, I wrote most of it while enjoying big glasses of Jim Beam Bourbon and Cola, which may account for the flippant captions.
ReplyDeleteI hope you enjoy this blog Thomas as I know you really liked the film.
All the best my friend
Peter
With Cola? Yikes, don't scare me like that. There are better ways to enjoy a Whisky, my friend. An 18 year old Glenlivet with absolutely no ice and served in a nosing glass, that's more to it. On the other hand it's almost summer down there in NZ isn't it? So maybe that's the best thing you can do to a Jim Beam ;-)
ReplyDeleteWonderful entry! I saw this film in 1974 as a student at UC Berkeley! Sat through it twice. Also the image of the Hyperion shown on the lower right corener, along with mechanical whale, was for Disney Imagineering for a proposed Jules Vern themed land.
ReplyDeleteMichael Goldberg
Nashville, TN
Just curious Pete, is Sense of Scale just reminiscing about working on various movies or are there many discussions on how various miniatures were built? Great new blog addition as usual...
ReplyDeleteHi Steve
ReplyDeleteThe doco covers pretty much everything you'd want to know about the art of movie miniaturisation. It's probably more slanted at individual accounts of experiences in the field but theres plenty of good demos of various techniques in making these 'big boys toys' look so damned good on screen. I'm confident you won't be disappointed, and at just 25 Euro it's a steal.
Peter
Hi, Pete
ReplyDeleteFirst off, I just want to say I REALLY enjoy your blog. I am a huge fan of traditional effects, and especially matte paintings. When I found your site I thought for sure I'd died and gone to heaven.
I remember well seeing Island at the Top of the World as a kid and being utterly amazed by the visuals. I still live with the regret of having missed the theatrical run of In Search of the Castaways around the same time.
On an FX-related note, I'm posting a link for you to a 2-minute vid that I finished only yesterday. It was created to compete in a contest being held by Dailymotion and sci-fi mogul JJ Abrams. It was shot entirely practical in a single afternoon. Mostly, because I spent some 200+ hours the preceding 3 weeks building a host of props, miniatures, costumes and sets.
Only a fraction of the items actually made it into the final production, as my nephews and I only succeeded in shooting a single entire scene, which then forced me to retool what was to be a semi-grand affair into a single joke premise. Not to mention, building additional props and miniatures while I was already neck deep in perfectly acceptable, now unusable ones.
The finished product is but a fraction of what I originally envisioned, but it fondly recalls the likes of Melchior, Blaisdell, Bowie and Bava. For that only, I think you may find it a welcome diversion.
Kind regards,
Michael Prestage
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xv3c2j_robinson-robot-s-o-s_shortfilms
Several pics from the shoot. They contain MAJOR SPOILERS!
http://i47.tinypic.com/faynt0.jpg
http://i49.tinypic.com/2mdo1vd.jpg
http://i50.tinypic.com/29p6dy0.jpg
Hi Michael,
DeleteI love it!!!! Wonderful and talk about a twist ending! I live the L.B Abbott 'Apes' spaceship, and obviously Chuck Jones was an influence too (where was the Carl Stalling score?)
At this rate you might be the subject of one of those famous NZPete blog retrospectives yourself!!!
All the best
Peter
In an effort to stay at least moderately on topic here, I'd like to add that while a number IATTOTW's effects are not entirely successful, the cumulative visual impact of the production as a whole is magnificent. I can think of no other film that Mr. Ellenshaw lent his considerable talents to that achieves the sheer scope that Island strove for, surpassing even the great 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, though the latter's effects work is unarguably more consistent.
DeleteThe mere fact that some 40 years hence, we are still discussing Island's merits proves that Ellenshaw's grand if somewhat overly ambitious efforts were hardly in vain. Regretfully, Island at the Top of the World closed a chapter in Disney's once lucrative output of literate, most often period-piece, high adventure films. A wonderful genre that I, for one, have sorely missed.
Going a bit off topic here, Pete. What can I say but you are now officially my favorite critic! I was terribly worried that even if you found the time to review my short at all, that it might result in a thumbs down from the one person I least wanted to disappoint. When I saw your favorable review I was floored. Voting ended yesterday, and, while not a total bust, the short ended up in 20th place in a field of 109 entries. While not the springboard project I initially hoped it could be, in addition to the ample boost provided by your stamp of approval, I did have the privilege of corresponding with venerable, Hollywood historian Bob Burns, who was every bit as friendly and supportive as one would imagine, and, lastly, Martin Bower, legendary Space:1999, Alien and Outland modelmaker. Who, like Bob, not only offered words of support but also sent me personal photos of their exploits and work. All things considered, it's a lot tougher to feel like a loser than I thought it would be!
Not easily dissuaded, I've already begun the process of polishing up all of the props, costumes and spaceships in an effort to get them presentable for a 35mm shoot of the full 6 min. project as it was originally storyboarded. Should you find the time, I'm posting a Vimeo link where you can find a short "making of" vid that compresses some 200+ hours of prop construction into just more than a minute, an over-the-top, faux-50's trailer for RR:S.O.S., as well as some 35mm test footage for a feature I have already in the works.
My Vimeo profile info explains a bit more about the movie's origins. In short, I've managed to finally get my hands on a working albeit 50+ year old movie camera, a handful of equally archaic but fully functional lenses, along with a small stockpile of antiquated Mole spotlights and peripherals, all in the service of making the most authentic, no-holds-barred, old-school creature feature that the 21st century has ever seen.
To ensure authenticity, I intend to bath the sets, actors, and salivating, animatronic creatures in light thrown from NOS tungsten bulbs discovered in an abandoned New Jersey warehouse, their boxes dated 1958. The aforementioned bulbs, will be supplemented with an additional cache of lamps, many of which house whimsically-configured filaments dating back pre-talkie and earlier. Light, literally, thrown from across the ages. As it stands, with a plethora of period props, miniatures, creatures and glass paintings in the works (yes, glass!), there will be photos shortly forthcoming.
Keep up the fantastic work, Pete... and, I'll attempt to do the same.
Kind regards,
Michael Prestage
https://vimeo.com/user5082328
Last but not least a big THANK YOU for this great article, Pete. I really enjoyed it. Those production paintings are amazing, as is the whole movie. One of Disney's best, in my opinion. But that's because i'm an old Jules Verne fan too and this work breathes the spirit of the master ;-)
ReplyDeleteVery fond of the work in this movie. I was 14 when I saw it in the theatre, and just starting to become fascinated with the art of visual effects for films. Thank you Pete and Harrison!
ReplyDeleteMark
Thanks Mark, It's always a pleasure chatting with you and I'm most interested to learn that THIS is the movie that switched you on to trick photography.
ReplyDeleteAll the best
Peter
Pete, this post brings back fond memories because "The Island at the Top of the World" was the first movie I saw in a Movie Theater (Double feature with "Dumbo", in the early eighties). Thank you so much for this post!
ReplyDeleteJoan
I'm delighted that so many have commented and also written emails to me as to how this film affected them back in 'the day', including several VFX guys of note.
ReplyDeletePeter
I enjoyed this very much. I was working in Disney's animation department in those days. I still remember my visits to Peter Ellenshaw's office and seeing those amazing paintings on glass. Thanks for bringing back some cool memories.
ReplyDeleteHi Floyd
DeleteSo good to hear from one of Disney's old backroom boys and that you enjoyed my articles on ISLAND and FORBIDDEN PLANET. My son is a 2D animator and loves all of the old cels & multiplane magic you guys mastered at Disney over the years.
Regards
Peter
Hi again Floyd
DeleteJust in case you catch this, my animator son is very familiar with, and is indeed a big fan of your work and would like me to pass along his kindest regards.
Peter
That's a real treat to hear. Thank you, very much. It's been a while since I visited this site. I enjoy it very much.
ReplyDeleteFloyd
Hi Floyd
ReplyDeleteIt's our pleasure.
Just on animation greats, my son has just alerted me to the new book on one of your contemporaries (though working for the opposition) - the great Looney Tunes background artist Maurice Noble. I'm very keen to read this as Maurice's work features prominently in so many favourite Warner Bros cartoons of the 50's.
All the best Floyd, and take care.
Regards
Peter and Jeff
As ever a fascinating look at a rather neglected picture, Pete! However, I find myself in the rare position of disagreeing with you! Regarding the design of the Hyperion, you wrote...
ReplyDelete"...The design is somewhat wacky and unappealing and I find that the earlier, rejected concepts of the airship to be more of my liking and quite elegant."
Obviously, it's all a matter of personal taste, but I would note that the Hyperion as depicted in the film is far from wacky and is quite close to the real-world designs of the French airship builders the Lebaudy brothers. See, for example, this vessel sold to Russia in 1909:
http://i59.fastpic.ru/big/2013/1029/35/3105e5331be3ea573756a8dac1dbe235.jpg
I actually find the conceptual drawing too 'science fictional' and totally unconvincing for the period. But, as I say, it's a matter of personal taste. However, I did just want to point out that whatever one may think of the aesthetic merits of the Hyperion in the film, at least the design was actually grounded in reality.
DonnellBW July 28, 2017
ReplyDeleteHand painted atmosphere in films is still to me much more "evocative" as "mood at a glance", than any of the best digi compositions, which are always a "tell" to me, and somewhat "soulless".
I love to be sold even when I know how it was done. This started for me with Conway's first glimpse at the valley of Shangri La in the original Lost Horizon, and looking at how museum dioramas "blended the 3D fore ground into the curved painted plaster cycs. I am glad to see that this magnificent film technique is finally being given the attention and careful archiving it deserves.
Especially the Ellenshaw ability to paint a full glass from scratch "all at once"(even over a couple of days),and not rely on a computer to remember a million bits. This to me is like doing mini Cistine Chapel ceilings where even random brush strokes work on the viewers mind and don't insult with the need for "photo realism".
Disney movies at a young age lead to a life long career as a stage set designer, and articles like this refresh the roots of what I always was fascinated by: the simple elegance of surprising illusion. Thank you for sharing every frame in your collection.
You are most welcome. I'm happy to get good feedback such as yours and it encourages me to make more blog posts and articles. I couldn't agree more with you on all of your points BTW.
DeleteBest
Pete